ABSTRACT
Introduction In Pakistan, the fourth wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) started around July 2021, which was dominated by the Delta variant of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. The vaccination drive to immunize the people of Pakistan against Covid-19 was also going on during this period. There were multiple types of vaccines being administered to the people of Pakistan, as the vaccines had been procured from multiple sources. Some people had apprehensions about different vaccines being administered in the country. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and outcome of the patients vaccinated against Covid-19 with those of the non-vaccinated patients during the fourth wave of Covid-19 in Pakistan Naval Ship (PNS) Shifa Hospital. Methods The cross-sectional descriptive study was performed at PNS Shifa Hospital Karachi, from July to October 2021. All the Covid-19 patients treated in PNS Shifa Hospital during the "fourth Covid-19 wave" were interviewed. Their medical records were accessed, and they were followed up till their discharge from the hospital. The vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients were compared for differences in their age or gender distribution, the severity of illness, comorbidities, and mortality. Results There were 884 participants in the study: 664 (75.11%) men and 220 (24.89%) women. There were 493 patients below 40 years of age, 233 were 40-59 years old, and 158 were aged 60 and above. One hundred and sixty-nine patients had one or more comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, various malignancies, bronchial asthma, and chronic kidney disease. There were 63 (7.13%) obese patients, 28 of whom developed severe disease. Five hundred and four (57%) patients were vaccinated and 380 (47%) were non-vaccinated. Among the vaccinated patients, the effect of Covid-19 was mild in 58.37%, moderate in 36.11%, severe in 0.79%, and critical in 4.37%. Among the non-vaccinated patients, the effect of Covid-19 was mild in 40.26%, moderate in 46.58%, severe in 3.16%, and critical in 10%. The difference in disease severity between the two groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion Vaccinated Covid-19 patients had significantly lower severity of disease and displayed better outcomes when compared to non-vaccinated patients during the fourth Covid-19 wave dominated by the Delta variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Typhoid remains a major healthcare problem in low and middle-income countries. The emergence of extremely drug-resistant (XDR) typhoid strains from the Indian subcontinent has led to very limited therapeutic options. Azithromycin being the only oral option for XDR typhoid faces a threat of rapid resistance due to its overuse after the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of azithromycin disc diffusion testing against clinical isolates of typhoidal salmonellae in comparison with E-test minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional validation study. Place and duration of the study: The Department of Microbiology, Pakistan Navy Ship Shifa hospital, Karachi from June 1 to December 31, 2020. METHODOLOGY: Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method for 60 isolates including Salmonella enterica ser. Typhi and Paratyphi A using Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines. MICs by the E-test method were determined for Azithromycin only. RESULTS: A significant proportion of the isolates (55%) had high azithromycin MIC in the wild-type distribution range (8-16 µg/ml). Ten (16.6%) isolates showed false resistance, i.e., zone diameter <13 mm by disc diffusion method when compared to E-test MIC results. Isolates with MICs close to breakpoint, i.e., 16 µg/ml were more likely to show discordant results. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of the disc diffusion method versus E-test were 100%, 83%, 100%, 9%, and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Disc diffusion method as recommended by CLSI is not reliable for azithromycin susceptibility testing particularly for isolates with high MICs in the susceptible range. The E-test method may be a better alternative to disc diffusion provided appropriate training is done prior to its application.